Taiwanese Authorities Scrutinize Blockchain Participants Linked to Polymarket Election Contract: Investigation Unveiled

The Election Act for the President and Vice President, along with the Recall Act in Taiwan, acts as a robust deterrent against engaging in gambling activities related to electoral proceedings. Recent developments leading up to Taiwan's impending election have brought attention to the legal consequences faced by individuals participating in such activities, especially through online platforms like Polymarket.

Local law enforcement in Taiwan has launched investigations into the promotion of Polymarket contracts by online influencers and members of the cryptocurrency community. According to a report from BlockTempo, based in Taiwan, numerous influencers and individuals have been summoned for their involvement in Polymarket contracts, enabling users to place bets on the outcome of the January election.

The aggregate amount wagered on a contract associated with the election currently surpasses $300,000. Notably, the market favors the candidate from the Democratic Progressive Party, Lai Ching-te (also known as William Lai), giving him a 78% chance of winning. Nevertheless, such betting activities are explicitly forbidden under Article 88-1 of Taiwan's Election and Recall Act for the President and Vice President.

Source: Polymarket 

The legal repercussions for engaging in election gambling in Taiwan are severe, encompassing potential penalties such as fixed-term imprisonment of up to six months, short-term detention, or fines not exceeding NT$100,000 ($3,196.85). Law enforcement agencies in Taiwan are actively surveilling and investigating any instances of gambling activities associated with presidential elections.

Sherman Lin, an attorney at Lin & Partners in Taipei, stressed the expansive legal interpretations applied to gambling offenses under the Election and Recall Act for the President and Vice President. This has resulted in investigations and convictions of operators of gambling websites targeting Taiwanese gamblers.

In contrast to Taiwan, the United States, including Nevada also prohibits gambling on election outcomes, a prohibition enforced by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Polymarket explicitly prohibits usage by U.S. individuals, aligning with the legal framework governing election betting in the country.

While Taiwan encounters jurisdictional challenges in taking actions against foreign entities involved in election gambling, legal proceedings are primarily aimed at domestic actors. Lin highlighted the decentralized nature of platforms like Polymarket, coupled with their lack of physical presence in Taiwan, restricting the reach of the Taiwanese judicial system. Consequently, law enforcement is likely to concentrate on online influencers actively endorsing such contracts.

Despite the absence of a legal precedent for decentralized platforms organizing election betting in Taiwan, recent cases involving online influencers promoting trading platforms suggest potential legal ramifications. This situation underscores the evolving landscape of legal challenges presented by decentralized platforms and emphasizes the necessity for jurisdictions to adapt their legal frameworks accordingly.

As of the current report, Shayne Coplan, the CEO of Polymarket, has refrained from providing any comments on the unfolding situation. The investigation into election gambling activities in Taiwan emphasizes the significance of preserving electoral integrity and discouraging practices that could jeopardize the democratic process.

Read More: Crypto Chronicles: Navigating the Legal Tides of 2023 in the Enigmatic World of Digital Assets