SEC's Strategic Approach: Drawing Insights from Terraform Victory in Coinbase and Binance Disputes

The recent legal verdict deeming Terraform's offerings as securities has emerged as a pivotal development for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in its ongoing legal tussles with various cryptocurrency exchanges. Leveraging its success in the Terraform Labs dispute, the SEC is using this outcome to influence judges in cases involving prominent platforms like Coinbase and Binance, contending that these exchanges facilitated the trading of unregistered securities.

Despite encountering setbacks in prior cryptocurrency-related court battles, including the high-profile lawsuit against Ripple and Grayscale Investments' effective challenge to the rejection of its spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) application, the SEC secured a significant triumph last week. The regulatory body successfully asserted that Terraform was inappropriately offering securities through its Terra/Luna stablecoin offerings and the Mirror Protocol.

In a filing dated January 4 within the Coinbase case, an SEC attorney apprised Judge Katherina Polk Failla that the resolution in the Terraform court supported the SEC's position, highlighting issues pertinent to the ongoing Coinbase case. A comparable filing was lodged the day before in the SEC's dispute with Binance, underscoring the agency's successful argument in a different legal context.

Judge Jed Rakoff, overseeing the Terra case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, ruled decisively in favor of the SEC. Rakoff dismissed the defendants' attempt to challenge established law, affirming that tokens UST, LUNA, and MIR should be considered investment contracts. This ruling aligns with the SEC's contentions in the Coinbase and Binance cases, where the platforms stand accused of enabling the trading of unregistered securities.

Despite these significant developments, analysts, such as Jaret Seiberg from TD Cowen, urge caution against interpreting this as a complete reversal of fortune for the SEC. Seiberg posits that these outcomes signify an ongoing evolution in legal interpretations regarding the application of securities laws to cryptocurrency products. He anticipates that decisions made at the district court level will eventually be superseded by higher authorities like federal appeals courts and, potentially, the Supreme Court, a process likely to unfold over several years.

The SEC's case against Terraform and Do Kwon is slated for trial on January 29 to address remaining disputes. A spokesperson for Terraform vehemently disagreed with Judge Rakoff's decision, underscoring the company's steadfast commitment to vigorously defending itself against what they perceive as baseless allegations. Meanwhile, Coinbase opted not to provide a comment on the SEC's latest filing in their case.

Read More: Resilient Expansion: Binance's User Base Surges by 30% Despite U.S. Legal Resolutions