Apple's Payment Wars: Legal Wrangles and Cryptocurrency Constraints

Apple has faced a barrage of accusations related to purportedly non-competitive practices surrounding the utilization of payment methods on their ubiquitous devices.

One particularly noteworthy chapter in the ongoing saga of Cupertino's technology giant involves a highly publicized legal skirmish with Epic Games. This landmark case saw Epic Games emerging victorious, securing the right to apprise users of alternative payment methods that sidestep Apple's imposition of a 30% revenue cut through their Apple Pay system.

Limiting the Presence of Rival Wallets

In the tumultuous landscape of legal challenges, September witnessed Apple grappling with a private anti-trust lawsuit, alleging the abuse of its dominance on Apple devices to the detriment of competing wallets. Simultaneously, European Union regulators embarked on their own investigation, the outcome of which remains shrouded in secrecy.

Adding another layer to the legal tapestry, a recently filed class-action lawsuit in California takes direct aim at Apple. The crux of this lawsuit revolves around accusations of Apple severely constricting the use of cryptocurrencies as a viable alternative payment method. Plaintiffs argue that Apple users routinely find themselves at the mercy of arbitrary inflationary price hikes imposed on payment services, with scant alternatives at their disposal.

The lawsuit contends, "The iPhone stands as the quintessential platform for mobile peer-to-peer payments. Decentralized payments could empower iPhone users to conduct transactions without any intermediary, and at significantly lower transaction costs compared to the fees levied by Venmo, Cash App, and Apple for money transfers between bank accounts and credit cards. Despite the evident utility, decentralized payments remain elusive on the iPhone due to Apple's pervasive control over every app installation... via its App Store."

Capricious Implementation of Charges

Further complicating the legal terrain, the lawsuit asserts that Apple has purportedly engaged in anti-competitive agreements with CashApp and Venmo, peer-to-peer payment platforms operated by Block and PayPal. These alleged agreements are said to stifle both feature and price competition on a broader scale, effectively barring the integration of decentralized cryptocurrency technology into existing or new iOS Peer-to-Peer Payment apps.

Curiously, the lawsuit omits PayPal and Block as defendants, hinting at the possibility that the plaintiffs perceive these companies as having acquiesced to the terms of the alleged anti-competitive agreements. The determination of whether these agreements were coercive or mutually beneficial now rests in the hands of the presiding judge.

The legal saga continues with the accusation that Apple has adopted a stance of banning crypto-related apps from its App Store, exemplified by the exclusion of the Zeus Bitcoin wallets. Even the Damus decentralized social networking app, backed by Jack Dorsey, found itself on the brink of removal from the App Store due to its tipping feature, though it ultimately weathered the storm and retained its place on the platform.

Read more about: Crypto Rollercoaster: Market Moves and BNB's Surge